| Abstract|| |
Background: Donor deferral owing to anemia is one of the major causative factors of temporary donor rejection, which is preventable and treatable. The basic knowledge about frequency, types, and severity of anemia among donors will help plan a strategy to promote donor recruitment and overall national health.
Objective: The objective of this study was to provide the predonation deferral rate of the healthy blood donors based on peripheral blood counts and second to determine the types of anemia along with its severity.
Materials and Methods: Prospective records of all the reported donors were collected from January 2014 to December 2015 at Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. Donor samples were analyzed on an automated hematology analyzer.
Results: Overall, 36,954 potential donors reported to the blood bank, out of which 33,853 were selected and 3101 were deferred, which makes the deferral rate of 8.39%. Majority of donors (n = 2663 [7.20%]) were deferred based on peripheral blood counts. Based on peripheral count, anemia (91.8%) represents the major cause of deferral, followed by raised total leukocyte count (3.7%) and polycythemia (3.3%), and thrombocytopenia (1.0%) was the least potential cause. Microcytic-hypochromic anemia was found in 58.5% of the donors followed by normocytic and macrocytic anemia in 38.9% and 2.4%, respectively. Mild anemia was seen in 78.2% followed by moderate and severe anemia in 20.5% and 1.18%, respectively.
Conclusion: A high prevalence of anemia among blood donors signifies deteriorating health status not only in donor population but also in general population. This situation calls for more concerted efforts as otherwise it would lead to decreased blood donor pool.
Keywords: Anemia, blood donors, donor deferrals, Pakistan
|How to cite this article:|
Sultan S, Irfan SM, Baig MA, Usman SM, Shirazi UA. Insight into donor deferral pattern based on peripheral blood counts: An experience from South Pakistan. Asian J Transfus Sci 2017;11:151-5
|How to cite this URL:|
Sultan S, Irfan SM, Baig MA, Usman SM, Shirazi UA. Insight into donor deferral pattern based on peripheral blood counts: An experience from South Pakistan. Asian J Transfus Sci [serial online] 2017 [cited 2017 Sep 21];11:151-5. Available from: http://www.ajts.org/text.asp?2017/11/2/151/214357
| Introduction|| |
The high prevalence of anemia is still a major public health problem in the developing countries. Worldwide, anemia affects 1.62 billion individuals, which is estimated to be ~25% of the world population. Globally, around 10% of blood donors are deferred owing to low hemoglobin on predonation assessment.,, Similarly, in the United States, approximately 10% of all attempted blood donors are deferred due to low hematocrit. In a large majority of the donors in developing countries, anemia is correctable.
Practically, blood donors deferred due to anemia are less likely to return back due to negative sentiment even if they were regular donors beforehand. It has been observed that 30% of the donors deferred due to anemia are unlikely to come back within the next 5 years even if they have been regular blood donors compared with those who have been selected. Thus, the shortage of blood supply is overtly exaggerated.
As per the World Health Organization's guidelines (WHO) and American Association of Blood Banking (AABB), a specified cutoff of lower hemoglobin levels (<12.5 g/dL) for donor selection is defined, but the upper limit for hemoglobin, references ranges for white blood counts and platelet counts are not established yet., Each blood transfusion service is supposed to set its own reference ranges for peripheral blood count parameters.
In the present study, we aimed to assess the prevalence of donor deferral based on peripheral blood counts in otherwise healthy donor population. It would provide information about the actual health status in the healthy donors as well as in the general population. We also assessed the type and severity of anemia. Hence, donors deferred for anemia represent a considerable percentage of the donor pool. By recognizing the type of anemia, future guide for developing programs to improve the blood donors' health and to promote donor recruitment will be made to optimize blood collection.
| Materials and Methods|| |
Data collection for this prospective cross-sectional study was carried through the records maintained at the Blood Bank of Liaquat National Hospital (LNH) and Medical College, from January 2014 to December 2015. LNH is an over 700-bed tertiary care teaching institute located in the metropolitan city Karachi. Our blood bank comprises experienced faculty, well-skilled technologists, and high-tech equipment.
Demographical data including name, age, gender, contact number, and type of donor were entered on a structured standard questionnaire. Donors were questioned about medical and prior history of donation. All donors were selected according to defined inclusion criteria taking into account, age (≥18 years), weight (≥50 kg), pulse rate (50–100/min), and normal pressure, having hemoglobin level ≥12.5 g/dL with hematocrit value packed cell volume of ≥38%.
Donors were excluded from the study if they had high-risk behavior, male homosexual, multiple sexual partners, history of jaundice in the past 1 year, drug abusers, tattooing, or had recent blood transfusion. Donors were deferred if hemoglobin is <12.5 g/dl or >18 g/dl, total leukocytic count (TLC) >14 × 109/l, or platelet count <100 × 109/l. Informed written consent was obtained from all the blood donors.
Complete blood count testing
Venous blood samples were collected in 1-mL K3-EDTA (Ethylene di-amine tetra acetic acid) anticoagulant VACUETTE tubes (Greiner Bio-one) from all donors. Complete blood counts (CBCs) were analyzed on Nihon Kohden MEK-6410K automated hematology analyzer. Appropriate controls were run simultaneously to validate the results.
Anemia was graded based on mean cell volume (MCV) values of <76 fL, 76–96 fL, and >96 fL into microcytic, normocytic, and macrocytic anemia, respectively. Severity of anemia was determined according to the WHO criteria into mild, moderate, and severe as ≥11, 10.9–8.0, and <8.0 g/dl, respectively.
Data collected were recorded on Microsoft Spreadsheet, and later statistical analyses were carried out using IBM statistics SPSS version 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Quantitative variables were reported in terms of mean and standard deviation. Frequencies and percentages were used to report categorical data.
This research protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Committee of LNH and Medical College prior to the study.
| Results|| |
During the period of study, 36,954 potential donors reported to the blood bank. Out of which, 264 (0.71%) donors were excluded based on history whereas 174 (0.47%) donors were excluded due to examination findings. The remaining 36,516 donors were qualified for CBC, of which 2663 (7.20%) donors were deferred based on deranged peripheral blood counts.
The selected blood donors comprised 33,853 participants, of which 33,717 (99.5%) were males and 136 (0.4%) were females. Overall, most (99.1%) of the donors were replacement donors (n = 33565) and only a small percentage (0.9%) included voluntary donors (n = 288).
A total of 2663 donors were deferred due to baseline outcomes of peripheral blood counts. The study participants had a mean age of 28.09 ± 8.04 (18–55) years with a median age of 28 years. Majority were males (n = 2612) and little were females (1.9%). Only 478 (17.9%) donors had a history of previous blood donations. As per the evaluated results, following are the main reasons for donor deferrals: Low hemoglobin levels (n = 2445 [91.8%]) being the most common cause followed by raised TLC and high hemoglobin in 3.7% (n = 100) and 3.3% (n = 90), respectively, and low platelet count (n = 28 [1.0%]) was the least common cause as shown in [Table 1].
The mean hemoglobin of deferred donors was 11.4 ± 1.0 g/dl with hematocrit of 37.4 ± 3.1. The MCV was 74.3 ± 11.2, and mean corpuscular hemoglobin and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration were 22.9 ± 5.3 and 30.6 ± 1.6, respectively. The mean TLC was 8.0 ± 1.8 × 109/l, and the mean platelet count was 297.6 ± 88 × 109/l.
Microcytic hypochromic anemia was found in 58.5% (n = 1431) of the donors followed by normocytic and macrocytic anemia in 38.9% (n = 953) and 2.4% (n = 61), respectively [Table 2]. Mild anemia was seen in 78.2% (n = 1913) of the donors followed by moderate anemia and severe anemia in 20.5% (n = 503) and 1.18% (n = 29), respectively.
| Discussion|| |
The present study gives an insight of existing trend of donors deferral based on peripheral blood counts in healthy blood donors. The study demonstrates the importance of performing CBC rather than reliant on copper sulfate method for semi-quantitative assessment of solely hemoglobin. Herein, in Pakistan, where blood banks mainly rely on replacement/family donations, a high prevalence of deferral rate (7.20%) based on blood counts among donor population is an alarming situation. The data reveal that iron deficiency anemia is the most common cause of deferral, thereby reflecting onto the health status of the general population.
We determined a temporary blood donor rejection rate of 7.2% which is within the established donor deferral rate as determined previously. A previous study from Pakistan had determined an overall deferral rate of 13.5%, out of which 6.7% of donors were deferred due to anemia and thrombocytopenia. We compared this finding to regional study's findings which were analogous; Indian and Malaysian studies revealed the deferral rate as 9% and 5.6%, respectively, and anemia was the most frequent cause of donor deferral in both studies., One recent Spanish study reported by Prados Madrona et al. detected 8.7% of deferral rate, largely contributed by low hemoglobin/hematocrit. Relatively higher prevalence was seen in a USA study by Zou et al. as 12.8% in a cohort of 47,814,370 donors, which is mainly related to donor safety reasons.
The present study determined a high rate of temporary rejections among healthy Pakistani donors due to low hemoglobin concentration (91.8%). Similarly, results of a recent large cohort study by Custer et al. on 3.9 million donors estimated low hemoglobin (76%) as the most common cause of temporary deferrals in America. Rabeya et al. and Agnihotri from Malaysia and western India, respectively, have reported low hemoglobin concentration as 40.7% and 55.8%, respectively, with predominance in younger female donors.,
Surprisingly, when the results of two local regional studies from Pakistan were compared, relatively very low frequency of anemia among donors (36.1% and 13.3%) was seen. This disparity is attributed to their very small sample (1833 and 3617) and it may be because of underestimation of anemia due to utilization of copper sulfate methodology., Moiz et al. from South Pakistan quoted 35.5% of donor rejection rate based on copper sulfate testing. We do not come across any Pakistani study addressing donor deferrals based on peripheral blood counts for comparison.
It is mandatory for all qualifying blood donors that they must have hemoglobin of at least 12.5 g/dl, as established by the Food and Drug Association and the AABBs, but they do not recommend a standardized method for hemoglobin estimation. Hemoglobin estimation is currently performed by several available methods, including the copper sulfate method, spun microhematocrit determination, spectrophotometric determination, or by automated hematology analyzers. The copper sulfate method is inexpensive and easy to use, but it does not give quantitative results and mostly relies on a subjective assessment. In Pakistan, most donor centers utilize the copper sulfate method to estimate hemoglobin levels and this led to acceptance of anemic donors. This study strongly highlights the need for revision of hemoglobin screening practices in our country. In view of frequent anemic borderline donors in the present study, it is strongly recommended to have a complete blood count rather to rely on semi-quantitative methods.
Our results showed that 78.2% of the donors had mild anemia with preponderance of microcytic hypochromic anemia (58.5%) as the leading cause of deferral followed by normocytic anemia (38.9%). Analogous to this finding, Bahadur et al. from India have quoted that 82.9% of the donors had mild anemia. Fortunately, only 1.18% (n = 29) of our donors were suffering from severe anemia. One recent study by da Silva et al. from Brazil established the presence of iron deficiency in 37.5% in their rejected donors. We did not determine the underlying etiological factor for microcytic anemia, which is our limitation.
In view of poor socioeconomical status and inadequate dietary practices in our country, it can be hypothetical that the presence of predominant microcytic anemia indicates advanced iron deficiency among our donors. Underdeveloped countries are considered to be an area of highest prevalence of iron deficiency due to variable reasons, mainly poverty and dietary habits as compared to the Western norms. Iron deficiency anemia and other microcytic anemia, including β-thalassemia and α-thalassemia trait, are other causative factors in our setting, which needs to validated. However, whatever will be the cause of anemia, its high prevalence indicates a poor health status in our general population. Furthermore, it strongly raises the question about the general health in Pakistani population.
Low hemoglobin level (12 g/dl) has been practiced in India and Bhutan to overcome a donors shortage., However, it is debatable for a long period whether to follow the international guidelines or follow the regional standards, but in the absence of local reference ranges of our population, it is reasonable to follow international guidelines.
The AABB has established a minimum limit of hemoglobin as 12.5 mg/dl for both genders, but did not set any upper acceptable limit. We determined the high hemoglobin level as a third reason (3.3%) for donor deferral. One recent Iranian study quoted that 24/1000 (2.4%) donors were rejected due to raised hemoglobin. In contrast to our findings, very low prevalence (0.1%) was seen in a Sub-Saharan African study.
Recently, the WHO revised the diagnostic criteria for polycythemia vera (2016); as diseases were possibly underdiagnosed using the high hemoglobin levels (Hb >18.5 g/dl and >16.5 g/dl in males and females, respectively) as established in 2008. At present, the threshold for diagnosis is Hb >16.5 g/dl and >16 g/dl in males and females, respectively. Here, it needs to be clarified that what would be the approach in the potential donors with hemoglobin between 16.5 and 18.5 g/dl; Would these donors can be selected or deferred; Whether they require molecular testing or bone marrow biopsy for confirmation of occult myeloproliferative neoplasm;
The AABB also not yet determined TLC and platelet counts' acceptable limits for donors. However, it seems to be a practical decision to set appropriate ranges for TLC and platelets counts as well depending on demographics, which we did. We deferred such donors and referred them to clinical hematologist for appropriate management.
Raised TLC (3.7%) is the indirect indicator of underlying infection, which should be regularly evaluated in all donors. We did not come across any study which documented the raised TLC as a cause of donor rejection.
Finally, thrombocytopenia is the least (1.0%) encountered cause of deferral in our study. Tufail et al. detected the low platelet counts in 1.8% of deferred donors in their series which is in parallel to our findings. However, Pujani et al. determined higher prevalence (37 donors out of 343 [10.7%]) of deferred donors for low platelet counts, which is attributed to higher (150 × 109/l) platelet count threshold for deferral. Though whatsoever the cause of thrombocytopenia, the donor screening will reflect platelet counts in general healthy population.
We would like to mention our limitation as well. The percentage of female donors is very low among deferred donors, due to which result cannot be generalized. Second, we did not have demographic details and relevant history of donors with high TLC, low platelet, and with raised hemoglobin.
To manage blood donors deferred for low hematocrit is a major challenge. A single blood donation removes 200–250 mg of iron from the donor. Iron replenishment therapy for 3 months following blood donation should be prescribed to regular donors or first-time donors depending on red cell indices. Government health policies for iron fortification can improve the general health of population. In future, more studies are definitely required assessing donors' health in relation to its etiology and prevention. Last but not the least, it is the foremost duty of blood bank staff to elucidate the cause of deferrals and guide the donors for hematological referrals for proper evaluation and treatment.
| Conclusion|| |
A considerable fraction of blood donors are deferred due to low hemoglobin, which is largely attributed to microcytic mild variant of anemia. The study highlighted the importance of complete blood counts rather to rely on semi-quantitative methods. Future large studies from our region are needed to determine the etiology and prevalence of donor deferral. Health policies need to be revised and should target toward general health awareness among the blood donors.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
De Benoist B, McLean E, Egli I, Cogswell M. WHO global database on anemia. Worldwide prevalence of anemia, 1993–2005. Geneva: WHO; 2008.
Dauar ET, Patavino GM, Mendrone Júnior A, Gualandro SF, Sabino EC, de Almeida-Neto C. Risk factors for deferral due to low hematocrit and iron depletion among prospective blood donors in a Brazilian center. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter 2015;37:306-15.
Mast AE, Schlumpf KS, Wright DJ, Custer B, Spencer B, Murphy EL, et al.
Demographic correlates of low hemoglobin deferral among prospective whole blood donors. Transfusion 2010;50:1794-802.
Mendrone A Jr., Sabino EC, Sampaio L, Neto CA, Schreiber GB, Chamone Dde A, et al.
Anemia screening in potential female blood donors: Comparison of two different quantitative methods. Transfusion 2009;49:662-8.
Annen K, Delaney M, Leitch D, Mast AE. The health implications of low hemoglobin deferral in infrequent blood donors. Transfusion 2015;55:86-90.
Newman B. Improving the US blood supply and blood donation safety for both women and men. Transfusion 2008;48:1032-5.
Custer B, Chinn A, Hirschler NV, Busch MP, Murphy EL. The consequences of temporary deferral on future whole blood donation. Transfusion 2007;47:1514-23.
Halperin D, Baetens J, Newman B. The effect of short-term, temporary deferral on future blood donation. Transfusion 1998;38:181-3.
Fung MK, Grossman BJ, Hillyer C, Westhoff CM, editors. AABB Technical Manual. 18th
ed. Bethesda (MD): AABB; 2014.
World Health Organization. Blood donor selection: Guidelines on assessing donor suitability for blood donation. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2012.
World Health Organization. Hemoglobin concentrations for the diagnosis of anemia and assessment of severity. Geneva (Switzerland): Vitamin and Mineral Nutrition Information System; 2011.
Tufail S, Babar F, Ikram N, Raza M, Abdul-Shakoor H. Blood donors deferral-causes. J Rawalpindi Med Coll 2013;17:119-21.
Bahadur S, Jain S, Goel RK, Pahuja S, Jain M. Analysis of blood donor deferral characteristics in Delhi, India. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2009;40:1087-91.
Rabeya Y, Rapiaah M, Rosline H, Ahmed SA, Zaidah WA, Roshan TM. Blood pre-donation deferrals – A teaching hospital experience. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2008;39:571-4.
Prados Madrona D, Fernández Herrera MD, Prados Jiménez D, Gómez Giraldo S, Robles Campos R. Women as whole blood donors: Offers, donations and deferrals in the province of Huelva, South-western Spain. Blood Transfus 2014;12 Suppl 1:s11-20.
Zou S, Musavi F, Notari EP, Rios JA, Trouern-Trend J, Fang CT. Donor deferral and resulting donor loss at the American Red Cross Blood Services, 2001 through 2006. Transfusion 2008;48:2531-9.
Custer B, Johnson ES, Sullivan SD, Hazlet TK, Ramsey SD, Hirschler NV, et al.
Quantifying losses to the donated blood supply due to donor deferral and miscollection. Transfusion 2004;44:1417-26.
Agnihotri N. Whole blood donor deferral analysis at a center in Western India. Asian J Transfus Sci 2010;4:116-22.
] [Full text]
Khan S, Rehman N, Raziq F. Donor deferral: Evaluation of causes on pre donor screening. Gomal J Med Sci 2012;10:23-6.
Moiz B, Salman M, Anwar M. Frequent anemic blood donors: What should we do; Transfus Apher Sci 2015;53:393-5.
da Silva MA, de Souza RA, Carlos AM, Soares S, Moraes-Souza H, Pereira Gde A. Etiology of anemia of blood donor candidates deferred by hematologic screening. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter 2012;34:356-60.
Badar A, Ahmed A, Ayub M, Ansari AK. Effect of frequent blood donations on iron stores of non anaemic male blood donors. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2002;14:24-7.
National AIDS Control Organization. Standards for Blood Banks & Blood Transfusion Services. New Delhi (India): Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2007.
National Standards for Blood Transfusion Service. Blood Safety Program: Health Care and Diagnostic Division. Thimphu (Bhutan): Department of Medical Services Ministry of Health; 2013.
Birjandi F, Gharehbaghian A, Delavari A, Rezaie N, Maghsudlu M. Blood donor deferral pattern in Iran. Arch Iran Med 2013;16:657-60.
Kouao MD, Dembelé B, N'Goran LK, Konaté S, Bloch E, Murphy EL, et al.
Reasons for blood donation deferral in sub-Saharan Africa: Experience in Ivory Coast. Transfusion 2012;52(7 Pt 2):1602-6.
Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, Thiele J, Borowitz MJ, Le Beau MM, et al.
The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood 2016;127:2391-405.
Pujani M, Jyotsna PL, Bahadur S, Pahuja S, Pathak C, Jain M. Donor deferral characteristics for plateletpheresis at a tertiary care center in India – A retrospective analysis. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8:FC01-3.
Department of Hematology and Blood Bank, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
[Table 1], [Table 2]