Asian Journal of Transfusion Science

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2014  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 32--34

Hepatitis C virus genotypes among multiply transfused hemoglobinopathy patients from Northern Iraq


Adil A Othman1, Adil A Eissa2, Raji D Markous3, Bayram D Ahmed4, Nasir A. S Al-Allawi2,  
1 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Zakho, Duhok, Iraq
2 Scientific Research Centre, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Duhok, Duhok, Iraq
3 Inherited Blood Diseases Centre, Central Public Health Laboratory, Duhok, Iraq
4 PCR Unit, Central Public Health Laboratory, Duhok, Iraq

Correspondence Address:
Nasir A. S Al-Allawi
Scientific Research Centre, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Duhok, 9 Azadi Hospital Road, 1014 AM Duhok
Iraq

Abstract

Background and Aim: Owing to the scarcity of data on hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes in Iraq and due to their epidemiological as well as therapy implications, this study was initiated aiming at determining these genotypes in Northern Iraq. Materials and Methods: A total of 70 HCV antibody positive multi transfused patients with hemoglobinopathies, who had detectable HCV ribonucleic acid, were recruited for genotyping using genotype-specific nested polymerase chain reaction. Results: The most frequent genotype detected was genotype 4 (52.9%) followed by 3a (17.1%), 1b (12.9%) and 1a (1.4%), while mixed genotypes (4 with either 3a or 1b) were detected in 7.1%. Conclusion: The predominance of genotype 4 is similar to other studies from surrounding Eastern Mediterranean Arab countries and to the only earlier study from central Iraq, however the significant high proportion of 3a and scarcity of 1a, are in contrast to the latter study and may be explainable by the differing population interactions in this part of Iraq. This study complements previous studies from Eastern Mediterranean region and demonstrates relative heterogeneity of HCV genotype distribution within Iraq and should trigger further studies in other parts of the country.



How to cite this article:
Othman AA, Eissa AA, Markous RD, Ahmed BD, Al-Allawi NA. Hepatitis C virus genotypes among multiply transfused hemoglobinopathy patients from Northern Iraq.Asian J Transfus Sci 2014;8:32-34


How to cite this URL:
Othman AA, Eissa AA, Markous RD, Ahmed BD, Al-Allawi NA. Hepatitis C virus genotypes among multiply transfused hemoglobinopathy patients from Northern Iraq. Asian J Transfus Sci [serial online] 2014 [cited 2019 Aug 25 ];8:32-34
Available from: http://www.ajts.org/text.asp?2014/8/1/32/126687


Full Text

 Introduction



Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection constitutes an important health problem world-wide, particularly in the Eastern Mediterranean region. [1] Iraq is a large country in the latter region where previous studies reported an overall HCV prevalence reaching 3.2% among apparently healthy individuals and rates as high as 67.3% among multi transfused thalassemia patients. [2] HCV is characterized by genetic heterogeneity with at least six major genotypes, which vary in their nucleotide sequence, geographical distribution and outcome of antiviral therapy. Therefore, the determination of the HCV genotypes in a particular population is not only important as an epidemiological tool, but also as a guide to the duration and outcome of therapy and has a major impact on vaccine development. [3]

Studies on HCV genotypes among Iraqis are scarce, [2] so the current study was initiated aiming at determining the genotype distribution among multi transfused patients in Northern Iraq.

 Materials and Methods



A total of 70 HCV antibody positive multi transfused patients with hemoglobinopathies, who had detectable HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) by commercial quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) kit (artus® HCV QS-RGQ - Qiagen - Germany), were referred by the Inherited Blood Diseases Center-Duhok-Northern Iraq for HCV genotyping. Patients included 46 patients with thalassemia major and 24 with sickle cell disease.

RNA was extracted from serum using QIAamp viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen-Germany), then HCV genotyping was performed using nested PCR amplification of the core region with genotype-specific primers designed to detect nine genotypes namely: 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 3a, 3b, 4, 5a and 6a, [4] according to the manufacturer's instructions (Genekam Biotechnology AG-Germany). The serum was further used to determine the alanine and aspartate transaminase (ALT and AST, respectively) using reagents provided by Biolabo-France according to the manufacturer's instructions.

The study was approved by the ethical committee at the Faculty of Science, University of Zakho - Iraq and informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Statistical analysis utilized Chi-square and t-test as appropriate. P < 0.05 was considered to be significant.

 Results



A total of 70 patients were included in the study and their age ranged between 6 and 32 years (mean 14.5 years) and male : female ratio of 1.4:1. Total number of units received till the time of sampling ranged from 10 to 290 (mean 100.8).

HCV genotyping revealed that the most common genotype detected in 37 patients (52.9%) was genotype 4 followed by 3a in 12 (17.1%), 1b in 9 (12.9%) and 1a in 1 patient (1.4%), while 5 patients (7.1%) had mixed genotypes (4 and 3a in 4.25% and 4 and 1b in 2.85%). The remaining 6 cases (8.6%) were uncharacterized by the employed genotyping procedure. [Table 1] outlines some of the main parameters in each of the genotype categories characterized. There were no significant differences in age and sex distributions between the four most frequent genotypes (4, 3a, 1b and mixed). The liver enzymes ALT and AST were highest in the genotype 3a, however, these were not significant when compared to those in genotype 4, 1b and mixed genotypes (P = 0.11, 0.65 and 0.87 respectively for ALT and P = 0.24, 0.44 and 0.47 respectively for AST). Moreover, the total number of transfusions was highest in the genotype 1b, but this was insignificant, when compared to genotypes 4, 3a and mixed genotypes (P = 0.84, 0.66 and 0.89 respectively).{Table 1}

 Discussion



The finding that HCV genotype 4 constitutes (on its own or combined with others) 60% of the genotypes among the enrolled patients in the current study was slightly higher than the rate of 50% reported by a previous study on 48 thalassemia patients in central Iraq. [2] This finding is consistent with that reported from other Eastern Mediterranean Arab countries where genotype 4 is the most prevalent [Table 2], with Egypt having the highest prevalence world-wide. [1],[5] Interestingly, a large expatriate population of Egyptians lived and worked in Iraq in the seventies and eighties of the last century and actually became part of the donor pool of the blood banks then, before the introduction of routine HCV screening and may have contributed to current genotype pattern in Iraq. The latter hypothesis could be further assessed by determining whether the genotype 4 seen among our patients is of the 4a prevalent in Egypt or it is 4c/4d subtypes prevalent in Saudi Arabia. [5] It is important to note that in contrast to Arab countries, Non-Arab countries in the Eastern Mediterranean like Iran and Turkey have a different pattern where genotype 1 predominates. [6],[7] {Table 2}

The second genotype in frequency in the present study was 3a. This genotype is quite prevalent in Indian subcontinent where it constitutes from around a half to more than two-thirds of HCV genotypes as reported in various studies from India and Pakistan. [8],[9] It is also frequently encountered in Iran, where it constitutes almost a third of the genotypes. [6] However, this genotype was not identified in any case in an earlier study on thalassemia patients from central Iraq. [2] Genotype 1a, on the other hand, was found only sporadically in the current study (1.4%), which is in contrast to an earlier study from Baghdad (27.1%) and to some reports from Jordan, Iran, Lebanon, Syria, UAE and India where it is among the most frequent genotypes, but is similar to Egypt and Saudi Arabia where it is either absent or infrequent [1],[2],[6],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18] [Table 2]. Such variations in the distribution of HCV genotypes within countries is not unusual, [10],[11] and is important in devising regional management strategies.

The third most common genotype found was 1b, which was also commonly encountered in an earlier study from Iraq (22.9%) . It is among the most widely distributed genotypes world-wide and comprises a major part of the HCV genotypes in the Americas, Europe, China, Australia, Japan as well as most of the surrounding Eastern Mediterranean countries [Table 2]. [1],[2],[3],[10]

The presence of 7.1% of mixed genotypes (genotype 4 with the two other most frequent genotypes) is not unexpected and has been observed at higher-frequency in the previous study from Baghdad and in other studies on multi transfused patients from other countries. [2],[18]

The absence of significant differences in liver enzymes among various genotypes in the current study is shared by previous similar studies. [6],[19] However, other studies, like that of Ijaz et al. [9] have documented higher ALT in genotype 4 compared to other genotypes in Pakistanis while Chakravarti et al. [8] documented a higher AST associated with genotype 1 among Indians. In both these studies, findings were linked to higher viral loads in the respective genotypes. One drawback in the current study is that it did not include viral load data, which may have had added some useful information.

 Conclusion



It appears that about 70% of those genotyped in the current study had the less favorable genotypes (1 and 4) and thus consequently would require longer therapy durations. [3] Although the predominance of genotype 4 is similar to other studies from surrounding Eastern Mediterranean Arab countries and to earlier study from central Iraq, however, the significant high proportion of 3a and scarcity of 1a, is in contrast to the latter study and may be explainable by the differing population interactions in this part of Iraq. This study complements previous studies from Eastern Mediterranean region and demonstrates relative heterogeneity of HCV genotype distribution within Iraq and should trigger further studies in other parts of the country.

References

1Fallahian F, Najafi A. Epidemiology of hepatitis C in the Middle East. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2011;22:1-9.
2Al-Kubaisy WA, Al-Naib KT, Habib M. Seroprevalence of hepatitis C virus specific antibodies among Iraqi children with thalassaemia. East Mediterr Health J 2006;12:204-10.
3Zein NN. Clinical significance of hepatitis C virus genotypes. Clin Microbiol Rev 2000;13:223-35.
4Ohno O, Mizokami M, Wu RR, Saleh MG, Ohba K, Orito E, et al. New hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotyping system that allows for identification of HCV genotypes 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 3a, 3b, 4, 5a, and 6a. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35:201-7.
5Kamal SM, Nasser IA. Hepatitis C genotype 4: What we know and what we don't yet know. Hepatology 2008;47:1371-83.
6Kabir A, Alavian SM, Keyvani H. Distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes in patients infected by different sources and its correlation with clinical and virological parameters: A preliminary study. Comp Hepatol 2006;5:4.
7Turhan V, Ardic N, Eyigun CP, Avci IY, Sengul A, Pahsa A. Investigation of the genotype distribution of hepatitis C virus among Turkish population in Turkey and various European countries. Chin Med J (Engl) 2005;118:1392-4.
8Chakravarti A, Dogra G, Verma V, Srivastava AP. Distribution pattern of HCV genotypes & its association with viral load. Indian J Med Res 2011;133:326-31.
9Ijaz B, Ahmad W, Javed FT, Gull S, Sarwar MT, Kausar H, et al. Association of laboratory parameters with viral factors in patients with hepatitis C. Virol J 2011;8:361.
10Sievert W, Altraif I, Razavi HA, Abdo A, Ahmed EA, Alomair A, et al. A systematic review of hepatitis C virus epidemiology in Asia, Australia and Egypt. Liver Int 2011;31 Suppl 2:61-80.
11Narahari S, Juwle A, Basak S, Saranath D. Prevalence and geographic distribution of Hepatitis C Virus genotypes in Indian patient cohort. Infect Genet Evol 2009;9:643-5.
12Marie MA. Genotyping of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in infected patients from Saudi Arabia. Afr J Microbiol Res 2011;5:2388-90.
13Ramia S, Koussa S, Taher A, Haraki S, Klayme S, Sarkis D, et al. Hepatitis-C-virus genotypes and hepatitis-G-virus infection in Lebanese thalassaemics. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 2002;96:197-202.
14Abdel-Hamid M, El-Daly M, Molnegren V, El-Kafrawy S, Abdel-Latif S, Esmat G, et al. Genetic diversity in hepatitis C virus in Egypt and possible association with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gen Virol 2007;88:1526-31.
15Bdour S. Hepatitis C virus infection in Jordanian haemodialysis units: Serological diagnosis and genotyping. J Med Microbiol 2002;51:700-4.
16Abdulkarim AS, Zein NN, Germer JJ, Kolbert CP, Kabbani L, Krajnik KL, et al. Hepatitis C virus genotypes and hepatitis G virus in hemodialysis patients from Syria: Identification of two novel hepatitis C virus subtypes. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1998;59:571-6.
17Alfaresi MS. Prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes among positive UAE patients. Mol Biol Rep 2011;38:2719-22.
18Omran MH, Youssef SS, El-Garf WT, Tabil AA, Bader-Eldin NG, Atef K, et al. Phylogenetic and genotyping of hepatitis C virus in Egypt. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 2009;3:1-8.
19Abraham R, Ramakrishna B, Balekuduru A, Daniel HD, Abraham P, Eapen CE, et al. Clinicopathological features and genotype distribution in patients with hepatitis C virus chronic liver disease. Indian J Gastroenterol 2009;28:53-8.