Asian Journal of Transfusion Science
Home About Journal Editorial Board Search Current Issue Ahead of print Back Issues Instructions Subscribe Login  Users: 1139 Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 16-20

Frequencies and specificities of red cell alloantibodies in the Southern Thai population


1 Department of Pathology, Blood Bank and Transfusion Medicine Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkla, South Australia
2 Department of Medical Sciences, Bureau of Laboratory Quality Standards, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, South Australia
3 SA Pathology Transfusion Service, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia

Correspondence Address:
Charuporn Promwong
Blood Bank and Transfusion Medicine, Sanpasitthiprasong Hospital, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0973-6247.106718

Rights and Permissions

Context: Detailed reports of red cell alloantibody frequencies and specificities in the Thai population are limited. The aims of this study were to determine the specificity and compare the frequency of alloantibodies detected using column agglutination technology (CAT) and conventional tube techniques in blood donors and previously transfused patients. Settings and Design: We retrospectively reviewed antibody screening and identification records for two time periods: January-December 2006 during which conventional tube techniques were used and January 2008-December 2009 when CAT was used. Results: The overall prevalence of alloantibodies in both patients and donors when using conventional tube techniques was 0.7%, for patients only was 0.9% and donors 0.6%. The most frequent antibodies detected in both groups were anti-Lea, anti-Mia, anti-Leb, anti-P1 and anti-E. When using CAT, alloantibodies were found in 0.8% of patients and 0.13% of donors with the five most common alloantibodies found in patients were anti-Mia, anti-E, anti-Lea, anti-c and anti-Leb respectively. Similarly the common alloantibody specificities in donors were anti-Lea, anti-Mia, anti-Leb, anti-M and anti-D. Conclusions: One of the most commonly identified alloantibodies in the Thai population studied was anti-Mia suggesting that Mia positive red cells should routinely be included in antibody screening and identification in this population. For antibody screening and identification, CAT method detected immune and warm alloantibody (ies) more frequently than that associated with conventional tube techniques.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4067    
    Printed216    
    Emailed3    
    PDF Downloaded37    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal

 

Association Contact us | Sitemap | Advertise | What's New | Feedback | Copyright and Disclaimer

2006 - Asian Journal of Transfusion Science | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 10th November, 2006