Asian Journal of Transfusion Science
Home About Journal Editorial Board Search Current Issue Ahead of print Back Issues Instructions Subscribe Login  Users: 161 Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 


 
LETTER TO THE EDITOR Table of Contents   
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 164-165
Validation of a hemoglobinometer for use in outdoor blood donation camps


Department of Transfusion Medicine, All Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication8-Aug-2016
 

How to cite this article:
Dubey A, Murti S. Validation of a hemoglobinometer for use in outdoor blood donation camps. Asian J Transfus Sci 2016;10:164-5

How to cite this URL:
Dubey A, Murti S. Validation of a hemoglobinometer for use in outdoor blood donation camps. Asian J Transfus Sci [serial online] 2016 [cited 2021 Apr 15];10:164-5. Available from: https://www.ajts.org/text.asp?2016/10/2/164/187943


Sir,

Hemoglobin estimation of blood donors is performed to prevent anemic donors from donating blood and ensuring a good quality of packed red blood cell component. Several devices are presently available for hemoglobin estimation of blood donors as a screening test before blood donation.[1] The desirable features of a device intended for mass screening include high accuracy, precision, rapidity, and ease of operation.[2]

In our part of country, there is a wide variation in temperature conditions. Thus, any device which has to be used for hemoglobin screening in outdoor blood donation camps should be able to give its optimum performance even at highest temperature range in that region. In this study, we have compared the performance of HemoCue Hb301 System at indoor temperatures (18–22°C) and outdoor temperatures (>35°C) in the month of July 2014.

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid anticoagulated venous samples of 100 patients which were sent for hemoglobin estimation were tested by manual cyanmethemoglobin method which was standardized using commercially available standards (Span diagnostics, Surat, India) as a routine testing method. For comparing the accuracy, these were tested by HemoCue Hb301 System both at in the air-conditioned departmental laboratory (T1) and at outdoor work station (T2) by the same operator. The samples initially placed at T1 for 1 h were tested by cyanmethemoglobin method and HemoCue Hb301 System. These were then kept at T2 for 1 h before retesting with HemoCue Hb301 System after ensuring their physical integrity. For comparing the precision, 5 samples tested by cyanmethemoglobin method were taken. Each was retested 10 times by HemoCue Hb301 System both at T1 and T2.

The results obtained are summarized in [Figure 1] and [Table 1].
Figure 1: Correlation of hemoglobin values between Cyanmeth hemoglobin method and HemoCueHb 301 system at (a) T1 and (b) T2

Click here to view
Table 1: Results of precision determination for 10 replicated performed on 5 patient samples at T1 and T2

Click here to view


HemoCue Hb301 is a quantitative point of care system based on photometric detection of hemoglobin level. A previous study has evaluated its performance against previous HemoCueHb 201+ system in diagnosing anemia of pregnancy and found it sufficiently precise and accurate.[3] The system is designed to operate at 10–40°C [4] but there are no studies to the best of our knowledge, for evaluating its performance at varied temperature conditions. The device has shown good accuracy at both T1 (correlation coefficient r = 0.903) as well as T2 (correlation coefficient r = 0.893). The precision of measurement was also good at both the temperatures with coefficient of variation ranging from 0.060 to 0.094 at T1 and from 0.041 to 0.085 at T2. Since the process of validation was performed before installation of the equipment in the department, it also allowed a chance for hands-on training of the technical staff. We conclude that HemoCue Hb301 system is adequately apt for both routine uses and use in outdoor blood donation camps.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Singh A, Dubey A, Sonker A, Chaudhary R. Evaluation of various methods of point-of-care testing of haemoglobin concentration in blood donors. Blood Transfus 2015;13:233-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Goldman M, Uzicanin S, Yi QL, Acker J, Ramirez-Arcos S. Validation and implementation of a new hemoglobinometer for donor screening at Canadian Blood Services. Transfusion 2012;52 (7 Pt 2):1607-13.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Tayou Tagny C, Kouam L, Mbanya D. The new HemoCue system Hb 301 for the haemoglobin measurement in pregnant women. Ann Biol Clin (Paris) 2008;66:90-4.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
HemoCueHb 301 Operating Manual. Angelholm, Sweden. Available from: www.hemocue.com. [Last accessed on 2014 Dec 16].  Back to cited text no. 4
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Anju Dubey
Department of Transfusion Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh - 249 201, Uttarakhand
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0973-6247.187943

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
  Search

  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1802    
    Printed26    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded28    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

Association Contact us | Sitemap | Advertise | What's New | Feedback | Copyright and Disclaimer

2006 - Asian Journal of Transfusion Science | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 10th November, 2006