Asian Journal of Transfusion Science
Home About Journal Editorial Board Search Current Issue Ahead of print Back Issues Instructions Subscribe Login  Users: 396 Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 147-150

Rapid dry plasma thawing system: An alternative to conventional thawing baths

1 Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute, Thrissur, Kerala, India
2 Department of Biostatistics, Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute, Thrissur, Kerala, India

Correspondence Address:
S Sanooja Pinki
Sifan Cottage, Kallambalam P. O., Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0973-6247.214356

Rights and Permissions

Background: Fresh frozen plasma (FFP) should be thawed before transfusing to the patient. Prolonged or uncontrolled thawing can denature plasma proteins. The potential risk of contamination by wet thawing had always been a point of concern. Aims: Here, we compared and evaluated the effect of thawing on clotting factor activities by two different methods (wet and dry) and other factors such as risk of bacterial contamination, throughput, turnaround time, and efficacy of thawing. Subjects and Methods: All FFPs were prepared from Group O donors and stored at −40°C. Twenty-one FFPs were thawed in Plasmatherm II at 45°C for 15 min and another 21 were thawed in thawing bath at 37°C for 20–30 min randomly. Analysis of prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen, and factor VIII was done in ACL TOP 300 (IL) at the time of preparation and immediately after thawing of FFPs. Volume, duration of thawing, ease of use, accessibility, and equipment maintenance were also compared. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in coagulation parameters after thawing in both methods compared to the time of preparation (P < 0.05), but all values were within normal limits. There was no significant difference in coagulation parameters between the two methods (P > 0.05). Mixed bacterial growth was observed from swabs taken from the water bath. Conclusion: Plasmatherm II can be a good alternative to water bath to rapidly thaw FFPs by preserving coagulation factors and eliminating the risk of bacterial contamination.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded25    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


Association Contact us | Sitemap | Advertise | What's New | Feedback | Copyright and Disclaimer

2006 - Asian Journal of Transfusion Science | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 10th November, 2006