ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
Year : 2018 | Volume
: 12
| Issue : 2 | Page : 123-126 |
|
Intra- and inter-model reliability of Hemocue Hb 201+ and HemoCue Hb 301 devices
Ashish Jain1, Nilotpal Chowdhury2, Sanchit Jain3
1 Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, SRHU, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India 2 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India 3 All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
Correspondence Address:
Ashish Jain Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, SRHU, Jolly Grant, Dehradun, Uttarakhand India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/ajts.AJTS_119_17
|
|
Aim: The study intended to estimate the intra- and inter-model reliability and agreement between the HemoCue Models 201+ and 301 in a blood bank donor screening setting.
Materials and Methods: Venous blood samples from 115 blood donors were analyzed by two Hemocue 201+ instruments and two HemoCue 301 instruments. The Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) as well as the Bland–Altman limits of agreement was measured.
Results: The 95% lower confidence interval (CI) of all the CCCs had a value >0.90. The CCC between instruments belonging to the same model was compared to instruments belonging to different models. The mean of HemoCue 301 was higher than HemoCue 201+ by 3.04 g/L with the 95% CI of the differences (i.e., the limits of agreement) between the two models ranging from −3.35 to 9.44 g/L. The bias between two instruments was lesser, and the limits of agreement were even narrower between instruments belonging to the same model.
Conclusion: The inter-instrument reliability and agreement are satisfactory in a blood bank setting. |
|
|
|
[FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|